Pina et al v. City of Sacramento et al
| Bertha Pina and Stephen Pina |
| National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, City of Sacramento, Betty Williams, Rick Warren, Community Resource Group and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People California State Conference of Branches Doing business as Sacramento NAACP Rhytham & Blues Festival |
| 2:2020cv00106 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Community Resource Group served on 3/10/2020, answer due 3/31/2020. (Underwood, Katherine) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Rick Warren served on 3/5/2020, answer due 3/26/2020. (Underwood, Katherine) |
| Filing 12 CROSSCLAIM against Community Resource Group, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Rick Warren, Betty Williams by City of Sacramento. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Summons)(Underwood, Katherine) Modified on 2/28/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
| Filing 11 ANSWER with Jury Demand by City of Sacramento.(Underwood, Katherine) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER with Jury Demand by National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Betty Williams. Attorney Daniels, David M. added.(Daniels, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Betty Williams served on 1/26/2020, answer due 2/18/2020. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Upon stipulation of the parties (ECF No. #7 ) and with the approval of the court, the deadline for the City of Sacramento to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) is EXTENDED for two-weeks. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extending the City of Sacramento's Time to File a Responsive Pleading by City of Sacramento. Attorney Underwood, Katherine Elizabeth added. (Underwood, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People served on 1/22/2020, answer due 2/12/2020. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED as to Rick Warren. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: City of Sacramento served on 1/22/2020, answer due 2/12/2020. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 KJM Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Sacramento, Community Resource Group, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Rick Warren, Betty Williams* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Irakli M. Karbelashvili* *AllAccess Law Group* *1400 Coleman Avenue, Suite F28* *Santa Clara, CA 95050*. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Bertha Pina, Stephen Pina. Attorney Karbelashvili, Irakli M. added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
| PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0972-8669537. (Karbelashvili, Irakli) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
