(PC)Townsend v. Encina, et al.
Arthur D. Townsend |
Debrina Sanchez and Melvin Encina |
2:2020cv00342 |
February 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Carolyn K Delaney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/24/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Arthur D. Townsend. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/24/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING #1 Complaint; and GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order and #11 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Arthur D. Townsend. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H) |
Filing 8 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 7 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/13/2020. New Case Number 2:20-cv-00342-CKD(PC). Old Case Number 1:20-cv-00209-JDP(PC). (Sant Agata, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, #8 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Arthur D. Townsend. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 6 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Arthur D. Townsend. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 5 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: New Case Documents served on Wasco State Prison. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *2/10/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 3/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Arthur D. Townsend, CDC BH-2677 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arthur D. Townsend. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Melvin Encina, Debrina Sanchez by Arthur D. Townsend. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sant Agata, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.