(HC) Frank v. Shurman
| Kyle Frank |
| A. W. Shurman |
| 2:2020cv00414 |
| February 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 8
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/3/2020. Consent or Decline due by 5/7/2020. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/3/2020 GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time; DEEMING #6 Motion to Proceed IFP timely; GRANTING #6 Motion to Proceed IFP; and DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days of the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami M. Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order served on Kyle Frank. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Kyle Frank. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to comply with #3 order by Kyle Frank. (Benson, A.) Modified on 3/30/2020 (Yin, K). |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/4/2020 ORDERING Petitioner to submit on the form provided by the Clerk, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed IFP or pay the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Kyle Frank. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Benson, A.) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Kyle Frank. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against A. W. Shurman by Kyle Frank.(Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Frank v. Shurman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kyle Frank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: A. W. Shurman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
