Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. Thahab, Inc. et al
| Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC and BR IP Holder LLC |
| Alam M. Jarrar, Thahab, Inc. and Reem Elhindi |
| 2:2020cv00450 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT TO COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTION AND DAMAGES by BR IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC re #1 Complaint. (Ver, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/9/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Reem Elhindi, Alam M. Jarrar, Thahab, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Aaron J. Ver* *Perkins Coie LLP* *505 Howard St, Suite 1000* *San Francisco, CA 94105*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiffs BR IP Holder LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC. (Ver, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs by Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, BR IP Holder LLC. Attorney Ver, Aaron J. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8766976) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ver, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
