(PS) White v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC et al
John A. White |
Jimmy Martinez, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, Charles Assay and O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC Doing business as O'Reilly Auto Parts |
2:2020cv00453 |
February 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
John A Mendez |
Kendall J Newman |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/2020 GRANTING plaintiff an additional 90 days to amend the complaint. (Kastilahn, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on John A. White. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 4 MOTION to AMEND Complaint and MOTION for an Extension to Time by John A. White. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/30/2020 DISMISSING #1 Complaint; GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and GRANTING plaintiff 21 days to either file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice. (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on John A. White. (Coll, A) |
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Huang, H) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by John A. White. (Huang, H) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Assay, Jimmy Martinez, O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC by John A. White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huang, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.