(HC) Murray v. Matteson
Terrance Edward Murray |
Gigi Matteson |
2:2020cv00777 |
April 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Allison Claire |
John A Mendez |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #7 Order. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/2/2020 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action and serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition on the CA Attorney General. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's #1 application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, Findings and Recommendations served on Terrance Edward Murray. (Yin, K) |
Filing 6 REQUEST for VERIFICATION and NOTICE re filing fee by Terrance Edward Murray. (Coll, A)(Response sent: "Petitioner's $5.00 filing fee was paid on May 26, 2020.") Modified on 6/2/2020 (Plummer, M). |
RECEIPT number #CAE200106554 $5.00 fbo Terrance Edward Murray by Terrance Edward Murray on 5/26/2020. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to DVI, 23500 Kasson Rd, Tracy CA, 95304 by Terrance Edward Murray. (Reader, L) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/2020 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. Clerk to send Petitioner copy of the IFP form. (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Terrance Edward Murray. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 5/21/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kaminski, H) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, served on Terrance Edward Murray. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Gigi Matteson by Terrance Edward Murray.(Kaminski, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Murray v. Matteson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Terrance Edward Murray | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Gigi Matteson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.