Robinson-Agles v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
| Melissa Robinson-Agles |
| TransUnion, LLC, Wells Fargo & Company and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00812 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Morrison C England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Wells Fargo & Company. (Lohr, Jessica) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Micon, Samuel) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER by Wells Fargo & Company.(Lohr, Jessica) |
Filing 15
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/15/2020 GRANTING #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Wells Fargo & Company's response to #1 Complaint is due by 5/21/2020. (Huang, H)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for EXTENSION of Time to file an answer to #1 Complaint by Wells Fargo & Company. Attorney Lohr, Jessica Rose Ellis added. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lohr, Jessica) Modified on 5/14/2020 (Becknal, R). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Micon, Samuel) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for a 15-Day Extension of Time to file a n answer to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney Micon, Samuel A. added. (Micon, Samuel) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER by TransUnion, LLC.(Blair, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/4/2020 ADDING attorney Christopher L. Blair, PHV for TransUnion, LLC. (Huang, H)
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT of CORPORATE DISCLOSURE filed by TransUnion, LLC. (Booth, Eileen) Modified on 4/30/2020 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by TransUnion, LLC for attorney Christopher L. Blair to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Booth, Eileen T. added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8867798) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order)(Booth, Eileen) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Wells Fargo & Company served on 4/23/2020. (Veggian, Lauren) Modified on 4/28/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: TransUnion, LLC served on 4/23/2020. (Veggian, Lauren) Modified on 4/28/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 4/23/2020. (Veggian, Lauren) Modified on 4/28/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Veggian, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, Wells Fargo & Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Lauren Brooks Veggian* *The Cardoza Law Corporation* *548 Market St., #80594* *San Francisco, CA 94104*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, Wells Fargo & Company by Melissa Robinson-Agles. Attorney Veggian, Lauren Brooks added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8853291) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Veggian, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
