(PC) Gonzalez v. Pesce et al
Raul Gonzelez and Raul Gonzalez |
Pesce, Mott and Pasioles |
2:2020cv00819 |
April 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Mott, Pasioles, Pesce* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Raul Gonzalez AK-1370* *MULE CREEK STATE PRISON (409020)* *P.O. Box 409020* *Ione, CA 95640*. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/16/2020. Consent or Decline due by 7/20/2020. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 8 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Raul Gonzalez. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendants: *Pesce*, *Mott*, and *Pasioles*. Operative Complaint, Summons, Notice of E-Service Waiver, Order re Consent, and this Order served via email on CDCR. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Attachments: #1 CDCR Notice of Waiver) (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and #6 Order served on Raul Gonzalez. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H) |
Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Raul Gonzalez. (Becknal, R) |
CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Raul Gonzalez, CDCR# AK-1370 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *4/21/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 5/26/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Raul Gonzelez. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raul Gonzelez. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Mott, Pasioles, Pesce by Raul Gonzelez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.