Baker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
| Sheri Baker and William Baker |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00823 |
| April 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to STAY Proceedings re 12 Minute Order by Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Attorney Hickson, Janet L. added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Proposed Order)(Hickson, Janet) Modified on 6/18/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: On the court's own motion, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 9/3/2020 is VACATED and ADVANCED to 7/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, with the filing of a joint status report due fourteen (14) days prior. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to DISMISS by Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/24/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Montenegro, Mayela) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Montenegro, Mayela) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Montenegro, Mayela) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. served on 5/8/2020 (Pope, N.) Modified on 6/2/2020 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wright Medical Technology, Inc. by William Baker, Sheri Baker.(Pope, N.) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. served on 5/8/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Pope, N.) |
| Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/7/2020 ORDERING Attorney N. Kirkland Pope, to appear for Sheri Baker, and William Baker.(Reader, L) |
| Filing 4 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Sheri Baker, William Baker for attorney N. Kirkland Pope to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-8861621) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Garilli, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/3/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Wright Medical Technology, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Roger A. Dreyer* *Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, LLP* *20 Bicentennial Circle* *Sacramento, CA 95826*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wright Medical Technology, Inc. by William Baker, Sheri Baker. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8855827) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dreyer, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
