(SS) Webber v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Delores Diann Webber |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2020cv00849 |
| April 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coder, Ellinor) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Delores Diann Webber. Commissioner of Social Security served on 5/29/2020. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Weems, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Delores Diann Webber pursuant to order of the court. (Weems, Robert) |
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 8/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Robert Weems* *769 Center Blvd.* *PMB 38* *Fairfax, CA 94930*. (Coll, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/19/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk to issue process. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM all necessary documents to effectuate service on the defendant. The USM is DIRECTED to serve all process no later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Coll, A)
|
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Delores Diann Webber. (Weems, Robert) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Delores Diann Webber. Attorney Weems, Robert added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weems, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Webber v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Delores Diann Webber | |
| Represented By: | Robert Weems |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Ellinor Ravenel Coder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
