Carrillo v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al
| Jesus Carrillo |
| Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc. and Tenet Healthcare Corporation |
| 2:2020cv00865 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/20/2020 APPROVING #4 Stipulation and DISMISSING Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party bearing that own party's attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of DIsmissal and Order of Dismissal by Jesus Carrillo. (Tabak, Stewart) Modified on 5/21/2020 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Doctors Hospital of Manteca, Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Stewart M. Tabak* *Tabak Law Firm* *250 Dorris Place* *Stockton, CA 95204*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Jesus Carrillo. Attorney Tabak, Stewart M. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8865198) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tabak, Stewart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
