(PC) Frazier v. Janam et al
| Maurice L. Frazier |
| Elston, McFadden, CA Departmen of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Janam, Bartkiewicz and Cooper |
| 2:2020cv00978 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/23/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Maurice L. Frazier. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/23/2020 GRANTING #5 and #7 Motions to Proceed IFP; DISMISSING #1 Complaint with leave to amend; GRANTING Plaintiff 60 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint; ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING defendant CDCR be dismissed from this action. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-0978 KJM DB (PC). (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order and Findings and Recommendations, #10 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, and prisoner complaint form served on Maurice L. Frazier. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Maurice L. Frazier. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Maurice L. Frazier. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/18/2020 DIRECTING the Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, either the $350.00 filing fee plus the $50.00 administrative fee or a properly completed application to proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff an IFP application. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Application served on Maurice L. Frazier. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 6/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Coll, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Maurice L. Frazier. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Maurice L. Frazier. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Maurice L. Frazier. (Coll, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
