(PC) Johnson v. Garcia et al
| Tyrone Johnson |
| Brun, Dix, Garcia and Lazo |
| 2:2020cv01062 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendants Garcia, Lazo, Dix, and Brun. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Brun, Dix, Garcia, Lazo* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tyrone Johnson AL-0115* *CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE FACILITY* *P.O. Box 213040* *Stockton, CA 95213*. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 9
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/8/2020. Consent or Decline due by 8/10/2020. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #5 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/7/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Tyrone Johnson. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/7/2020 GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed IFP and FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendants: *Garcia*, *Lazo*,*Dix*, and *Brun*. Operative Complaint, Summons, Order re Consent,Notice of E-Service Waiver and this Order served via email on CDCR. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Attachments: #1 CDCR Notice of Waiver) (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Tyrone Johnson. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Tyrone Johnson. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/28/2020 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an application to proceed IFP on the form provided by the Clerk, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. Clerk directed to send Plaintiff new IFP application. (Tupolo, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Tyrone Johnson. (Tupolo, A) |
| RESERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, IFP Application served on Tyrone Johnson. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *5/26/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 6/29/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Tyrone Johnson. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Brun, Dix, Garcia, Lazo by Tyrone Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
