Shannon v. Sacramento Job Corps Center, et al.,
| Erika Shannon |
| Adams Associates, Inc. and Sacramento Job Corps Center |
| 2:2020cv01080 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Adams Associates, Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for KJM. (Adams, John) |
| Filing 3 (DISREGARD; REFER TO AMENDED FILING AT ECF NO. #4 ) CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Adams Associates, Inc. re #2 Civil New Case Documents for KJM. (Adams, John) (Docket Text Modified on 6/9/2020 by C. Schultz) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/8/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court, case number 34-2019-00263179 by Adams Associates, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8911802) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Declaration of Tiffinay Pagni, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Proof of Service)(Adams, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
