Mirzada v. Wolf et al
Abdul Ghaffar Mirzada |
Wendell Anderson, Chad Wolf, Richard Valieka and William P. Barr |
2:2020cv01250 |
June 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
John A Mendez |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE to Sergio Valdovinos: You are not admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California. This will be the last electronic notification you receive until you are admitted. Concurrently to this notification, an email with instructions is being sent to you. Please complete the admissions process immediately. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Donati, J) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Donati, J) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Wendell Anderson, William P. Barr, Richard Valieka, Chad Wolf* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Sergio Valdovinos* *The Valdovinos Firm* *1280 Rosecrans Avenue #120* *Manhattan Beach, CA 90266*. (Donati, J) |
Filing 1 USCA ORDER: The Petition is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California. The petition is deemed filed as of 6/10/2020. (Donati, J) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Wendell Anderson, William P. Barr, Richard Valieka, Chad Wolf by Abdul Ghaffar Mirzada.(Donati, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.