(PC) Blakeney v. Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Plaintiff: Key Blakeney
Defendant: Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center, Sacramento County and Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Case Number: 2:2020cv01270
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/2/2020 DENYING as unnecessary #10 Motion for Extension of Time; DISCHARGING #8 Order to Show Cause; and DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms with Notice of Submission of Documents within 30 days from the date of this order. Service is appropriate for Sacramento County. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Form with instruction sheet, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 6/24/2020. (Henshaw, R)
August 3, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order, 1 Summons, 1 USM-285 Form with instruction sheet, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 6/24/2020 served on Key Blakeney. (Henshaw, R)
July 30, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to file response re #8 Order to Show Cause by Key Blakeney. (Kaminski, H)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Jail Trust Account of Key Blakeney signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/13/2020. The Sheriff shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/13/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's #2 , #7 request for leave to proceed ifp. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order. Within 30 days, plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Yin, K)
July 13, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, #8 Order to Show Cause served on Key Blakeney. Copy of #9 order and ifp served on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. (Yin, K)
July 8, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Key Blakeney. (Becknal, R)
July 2, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A)
June 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/2020 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Henshaw, R)
June 30, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and IFP application served on Key Blakeney. (Henshaw, R)
June 26, 2020 Filing 4 AMENDED PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Plummer, M)
June 26, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Key Blakeney. (Plummer, M)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/30/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Becknal, R)
June 25, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Key Blakeney. (Becknal, R)
June 24, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Key Blakeney. (Becknal, R)
June 24, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center by Key Blakeney.(Becknal, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Blakeney v. Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Key Blakeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rio Consumnes Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?