Valyrian IP LLC v. Telus Communications (U.S.) Inc.
| Valyrian IP LLC |
| Telus Corporation, Telus Communications (U.S.) Inc. and Telus Corporation Doing business as Telus Communications (U.S.) Inc. |
| 2:2020cv01315 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| William B Shubb |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PATENT NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Patent #1:* 6,970,706 * * 11/29/2005 * * Valyrian IP LLC * ; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/9/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Patent Report, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Telus Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kirk J. Anderson* *Budo Law PC* *5610 Ward Rd., Suite 300* *Arvada, CA 80002*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 PATENT FILING REPORT filed by Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Valyrian IP LLC. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Telus Corporation by Valyrian IP LLC. Attorney Anderson, Kirk added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8970291) (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Kirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
