Moore v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.et al
Glenn Moore |
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis Corporation |
2:2020cv01405 |
July 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Morrison C England |
John A Mendez |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Order Continuing Deadline to Meet and Confer Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(F) by Novartis Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continuing Deadline to Meet and Confer Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(F))(Heinicke, Malcolm) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/3/20 ORDERING that the defaults against Defendants Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis Cooperation be set aside, and that Defendants may file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to set aside #12 and #13 Clerk's Entry of Default by Novartis Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Attorney Heinicke, Malcolm A. added. (Heinicke, Malcolm) Modified on 9/4/2020 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 13 [SET ASIDE per order of 9/4/20] CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation* (Becknal, R) Modified on 9/4/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 12 [SET ASIDE per order of 9/4/20] CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Novartis Corporation* (Becknal, R) Modified on 9/4/2020 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Novartis Corporation by Glenn Moore. (Lucas, Robert) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation by Glenn Moore. (Lucas, Robert) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Novartis Corporation served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. (Lucas, Robert) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. (Lucas, Robert) |
Filing 7 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Donati, J) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to the 5 Minute Order Reassigning Case, this action is Randomly REASSIGNED to District Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. is no longer associated with this case. The case number on all future filed documents shall be: 2:20-cv-1405 JAM DB. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Donati, J) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by relief courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to the senior status of District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., the Clerk's Office is directed to reassign this case to another district judge for all further proceedings. (Kennison, L) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Novartis Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Robert William Lucas* *Robert Lucas Law PC* *101 Parkshore Dr.,, Suite 100* *Folsom, CA 95630*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Glenn Moore (Lucas, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Glenn Moore. Attorney Lucas, Robert William added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8990903) (Lucas, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.