(PS) Valdez v. San Joaquin County Superior Court
| Ivan Valdez |
| San Joaquin County Superior Court |
| 2:2020cv01406 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
JUDGMENT dated *9/9/2020* pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/8/2020. (York, M)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/8/2020 ADOPTING #7 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING without leave to amend plaintiff's complaint. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and #11 Judgment served on Ivan Valdez. (York, M) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for JUDGMENT by Ivan Valdez. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to #7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Ivan Valdez. (Benson, A.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/6/2020 ORDERING that plaintiff's #5 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without leave to amend and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Zignago, K.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Ivan Valdez. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Ivan Valdez re #5 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ivan Valdez. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/16/2020 DENYING without prejudice #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. A properly-completed application for leave to proceed IFP due within 30 days of this order. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a new form application to proceed IFP. (Tupolo, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Ivan Valdez. (Tupolo, A) |
| RESERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, IFP Application served on Ivan Valdez. (Tupolo, A) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for HEARING by Ivan Valdez. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ivan Valdez. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against San Joaquin County Superior Court by Ivan Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PS) Valdez v. San Joaquin County Superior Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: San Joaquin County Superior Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ivan Valdez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
