(PC) Stanley v. Broomfield et al
| Gerald Frank Stanley |
| Lujan, Ronald Broomfield, Ralph Diaz and Avila |
| 2:2020cv01509 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from California Northern District case number 3:20-cv-06111. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/25/2020 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Gerald Frank Stanley. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 8/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Gerald Frank Stanley. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Gerald Frank Stanley.(Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
