(SS) Ronson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Darrell Crowder Ronson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2020cv01537 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/8/2020, Nunc Pro Tunc 09/08/2020: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 2:20-cv-01537-DB(SS). (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Hall, Richard) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coder, Ellinor) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Parties. (Hall, Richard) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Parties. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Summons via certified mail, #2 Proof of Service Summons via certified mail)(Hall, Richard) |
Filing 3 ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 11/2/2020 (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Richard Alan Hall* *BottomLine Lawyers* *1234 High Street* *Auburn, CA 95603*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Darrell Crowder Ronson. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9029362) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hall, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (SS) Ronson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Ellinor Ravenel Coder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darrell Crowder Ronson | |
Represented By: | Richard Alan Hall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.