(PC) Ramsey v. CDCR, et al
| Ravon Lovowe Ramsey |
| Salinas Valley State Prison, Rasheed and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
| 2:2020cv01651 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE of DOCKET CORRECTION (TEXT ONLY): This complaint was filed in as a new case due to clerical error. The complaint is construed as an amended complaint for case 2:20-cv-1605 EFB P and filed in such case. CASE 2:20-cv-1651 is CLOSED. (Plummer, M) |
| CASE CLOSED. Case opened due to clerical error and closed pursuant to chambers request. (Plummer, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction, served on Ravon Lovowe Ramsey. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Ravon Lovowe Ramsey. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Ravon Lovowe Ramsey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
