Keep 70 Safe v. CA Dept. of Transportation et al
| Keep 70 Safe |
| Rajpreet Bihala, California Department of Transportation, Adetokunbo "Toks" Omishakin, Adetokunbo Omishakin and Toks |
| 2:2020cv01675 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: On the court's own motion, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 1/14/2021 is ADVANCED to 11/6/2020 at 10:00 AM before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, with the filing of a joint status report due fourteen (14) days prior. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to DISMISS by California Department of Transportation. Motion Hearing set for 11/6/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Notice, #3 Declaration of Judith A. Carlson, #4 Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Proof of Service)(Walker, Brandon) Modified on 10/14/2020 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 8 AMENDED #6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Complaint by California Department of Transportation. (Walker, Brandon) Modified on 9/30/2020 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The court has reviewed the parties' Stipulation, ECF No. #6 , and notes the filing is silent on the specific extension of time the parties have stipulated to for Defendants to file their response to verified complaint, ECF No. #1 . The parties are directed to file an amended stipulation by Monday, 10/5/2020, clarifying the agreed upon deadline for filing responses to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION Extension of Time to File Response by California Department of Transportation. Attorney Walker, Brandon Sheldon added. (Walker, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Keep 70 Safe on 8/27/2020, Answer due 10/26/2020 (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service of Summons and Complaint)(Tsai, Mitchell) Modified on 9/17/2020 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Keep 70 Safe pursuant to order of the court. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service of Summons)(Tsai, Mitchell) Modified on 9/17/2020 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Rajpreet Bihala, California Department of Transportation, Adetokunbo "Toks" Omishakin* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mitchell Mu-Shuel Tsai* *Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney at Law PC* *155 South El Molino Ave., Suite 104* *Pasadena, CA 91101*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Keep 70 Safe. Attorney Tsai, Mitchell Mu-Shuel added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9066341) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Election RE Admin Record, #3 Notice to Attorney General, #4 Request for Hearing)(Tsai, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
