(PC) Haygood v. Ruiz
| Deon Haygood |
| R. Ruiz |
| 2:2020cv01698 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Deon Haygood. (Kaminski, H) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Deon Haygood, CDCR# T-15851 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deon Haygood. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H) |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/27/20 ORDERING plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completeapplication to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By A Prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order, and prisoner IFP form served on Deon Haygood. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Consent or Decline due by 9/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/25/2020. New Case Number 2:20-cv-01698-AC (PC). Old Case Number 1:20-cv-01191-BAM (PC). (Jessen, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Deon Haygood. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Deon Haygood. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against R. Ruiz by Deon Haygood. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Haygood v. Ruiz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: R. Ruiz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deon Haygood | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
