(HC) Battle v. Unknown
Petitioner: Arthur J.M. Battle, III
Respondent: Unknown
Case Number: 2:2020cv01851
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Referring Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Arthur J.M. Battle, III. (Zignago, K.)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Zignago, K.)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Edmund F. Brennan* to *Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson* for all further proceedings. As of October 1, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson is reassigned to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California. (Donati, J)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on Arthur J.M. Battle III. (Donati, J)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/21/2020 ORDERING Mr. Battle to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus using the form the Clerk provided and either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form the Clerk provided, within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, habeas form, and IFP application served on Arthur J.M. Battle III. (Henshaw, R)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kastilahn, A)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Arthur J.M. Battle, III. (Kastilahn, A)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Unknown by Arthur J.M. Battle, III.(Kastilahn, A)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Unknown by Arthur J.M. Battle, III.(Kastilahn, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Battle v. Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arthur J.M. Battle, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?