(PC) Adams v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
Plaintiff: William Adams
Defendant: Kevin Molle, T. Tozi, California Prison Industry Authority, Nancy Chamberlian and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Case Number: 2:2020cv01901
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Referring Judge: Jeremy D Peterson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE OF INTENT TO WAIVE SERVICE by defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. AG Waiver of Service due in 30 days. (Zignago, K.)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/10/2020. (for E-Service) (Yin, K)
November 10, 2020 Filing 13 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William Adams BF-3536* *Mule Creek State Prison* *P.O. Box 409020* *Ione, CA 95640*. (Yin, K)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/9/2020 FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND DIRECTING E-SERVICE on the following defendant: *California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation*. The Clerk shall serve this order via email on the CDCR, along with a summons, the Operative Complaint, the Order re Consent and Notice of E-Service Waiver. The Clerk shall also amend the docket to reflect only the defendant listed in the #11 Notice of Election. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Waiver) (Yin, K)
November 10, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order Finding Service of Complaint Appropriate served on William Adams. (Yin, K)
October 19, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF ELECTION to proceed only with the claims under Title II of ADA against CDCR by William Adams. (Tupolo, A)
October 9, 2020 Filing 10 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/7/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of William Adams. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
October 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/8/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING Clerk to add the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation as a defendant to this action; ORDERING all claims other than the potentially viable claims under Title II of Americans with Disabilities Act and 29 U.S.C. 794 against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation are dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days of service of this order; and ORDERING Plaintiff to return the attached notice within 30 days. (Henshaw, R)
October 9, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and #8 Order served on William Adams. (Henshaw, R)
October 1, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Becknal, R)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Edmund F. Brennan* to *Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson* for all further proceedings. As of October 1, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson is reassigned to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California. (Donati, J)
October 1, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on William Adams. (Donati, J)
September 23, 2020 Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by William Adams. (Tupolo, A)
September 22, 2020 Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for William Adams, CDC BF-3536 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Henshaw, R)
September 22, 2020 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *9/22/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 10/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Coll, A)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William Adams. (Coll, A)
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by William Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A)
September 22, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Adams. (Coll, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Adams v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Molle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Tozi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Prison Industry Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Chamberlian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?