(PC) Leonard v. Williams
Frederick E. Leonard |
L. Williams |
2:2020cv01909 |
September 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP served on the Director of CDCR pursuant to #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Frederick E. Leonard signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/21/2020. Plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with this order. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order Directing Prisoner Payment served on Frederick E. Leonard. (Yin, K) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A) |
Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Frederick E. Leonard. (Coll, A) |
Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Frederick E. Leonard, CDC BD-7691 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/29/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Huang, H) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Frederick E. Leonard. (Huang, H) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Frederick E. Leonard. (Huang, H) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against L. Williams by Frederick E. Leonard.(Huang, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (PC) Leonard v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: L. Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederick E. Leonard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.