(HC) Prince v. Ramsey
| David Swank Prince |
| Michael Ramsey |
| 2:2020cv01962 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-01962-TLN KJN. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on David Swank Prince. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by David Swank Prince. (Becknal, R) Modified on 11/12/2020 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/9/2020 GRANTING petitioner's #5 motion to proceed ifp and GRANTING petitioner 30 days to file a motion for stay and abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Petitioner is warned that failure to file a motion for stay and abeyance within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed as unexhausted. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order on Motion served on David Swank Prince. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by David Swank Prince. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST that the Courts Contact Butte County Jail re Filing Fees by David Swank Prince. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/6/2020 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on David Swank Prince. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Zignago, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on David Swank Prince. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Michael Ramsey by David Swank Prince. (Zignago, K.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Prince v. Ramsey | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Swank Prince | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Ramsey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
