Brasley et al v. City of Stockton et al
Antonio Brasley, Kenneth Brasley, Preston Gregory, Tomia Gayles Sagote, Mary Bryant, Antonia Brasley, Antevin Brasley, Issac Brasley, Kevousie Brasley, Herman Gayles, Kevin Brasley and Kevin Brasley, Jr. |
San Joaquin County, Abel Hinojos, Patrick Frando, City of Stockton and Daniel Burke |
2:2020cv01967 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
John A Mendez |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Patrick Matthew Buelna on behalf of Kevin Brasley. Attorney Buelna, Patrick Matthew added. (Buelna, Patrick) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Adante Pointer on behalf of Kevin Brasley. Attorney Pointer, Adante added. (Pointer, Adante) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Daniel Burke, City of Stockton, Patrick Frando, Abel Hinojos, San Joaquin County* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Douglas Robert Thorn* *1380 Lead Hill Blvd.* *First Floor, Suite 106* *Roseville, CA 95661*. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by all Plaintiffs. Attorney Thorn, Douglas Robert added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9151171) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thorn, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.