(SS) Manso v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Estephanica Poppie Manso |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2020cv02067 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/17/2020. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-02067-TLN KJN. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Weems, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Estephanica Poppie Manso pursuant to order of the court. (Weems, Robert) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 1/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Huang, H)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Robert Weems* *Weems Law Offices* *769 Center Blvd., PMB 38* *Fairfax, CA 94930*. (Huang, H) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM the necessary documents and file a statement with the court. The USM is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs within 60 days from the date of this order. The parties are hereby NOTIFIED that, after service of the complaint, this action will be STAYED pursuant to General Order Number 615, and there will be no scheduling order or deadlines in effect pending further order of the court. (Huang, H)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Estephanica Poppie Manso. (Weems, Robert) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Estephanica Poppie Manso. Attorney Weems, Robert added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Weems, Robert) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (SS) Manso v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Estephanica Poppie Manso | |
| Represented By: | Robert Weems |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
