(HC) Wirth v. Superior Court County of Sacramento
Petitioner: James Arthur Wirth and James A. Wirth
Respondent: Superior Court County of Sacramento
Case Number: 2:2020cv02213
Filed: November 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: John A Mendez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/21/20 GRANTING #6 Motion to Proceed IFP and DENYING #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The clerk of the court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice as second or successive. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
December 22, 2020 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-2213 JAM AC (HC). (Plummer, M)
December 22, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order,, Findings and Recommendations (Motion),, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel,, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, served on James A. Wirth. (Plummer, M)
December 14, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by James A. Wirth. (Coll, A)
November 16, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST for IFP application by James A. Wirth. (Kaminski, H) (Response sent: "Your requested forms are enclosed.") Modified on 11/18/2020 (Henshaw, R).
November 16, 2020 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kaminski, H)
November 5, 2020 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/10/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Kaminski, H)
November 5, 2020 SERVICE BY MAIL and EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, served on James Arthur Wirth. (Kaminski, H)
November 4, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Superior Court County of Sacramento by James Arthur Wirth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaminski, H)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Wirth v. Superior Court County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superior Court County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Arthur Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James A. Wirth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?