(PS) Harris v. New Rez. LLC et al
| Arthur Harris |
| Shellpoint Mortgage Management Servicing Co., New Rez. LLC and D. Tech IT II, LLC |
| 2:2020cv02340 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/21/2021: On December 1, 2020, the court denied plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. (ECF No. #4 .) On December 11, 2020, plaintiff filed a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis that cured the deficiencies of the first. Before the court ruled on plaintiff's renewed application, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint, which is set for hearing on January 27, 2021. (ECF No. #8 .) To date, plaintiff has not opposed or otherwise responded to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, plaintiff's renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. In addition, the January 27, 2021 hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to February 17, 2021 at 10:00 AM. Plaintiff shall file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion no later than February 3, 2021. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, no later than February 10, 2021. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file a timely opposition to defendants' motion may be construed by the court as a non-opposition to the motion and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. L.R. 230(c). (Text Only Entry)(Streeter, J) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 10 Minute Order served on Arthur Harris. (Streeter, J) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Cahill, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS by New Rez. LLC, Shellpoint Mortgage Management Servicing Co. Motion Hearing set for 1/27/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Consent Form, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Exhibits)(Cahill, Jonathan) Modified on 12/23/2020 (Huang, H). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE re Section 12 USCS 2605 Challenge by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/1/2020 DENYING the plaintiff's unsigned motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #3 )without prejudice; and GRANTING plaintiff leave to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Becknal, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Arthur Harris. (Becknal, R) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Arthur Harris. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
