(PS) Rhuma et al v. State of Libya
| Khadija Kanoun, Mohamad Laham and Taher Rhuma |
| State of Libya |
| 2:2020cv02366 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by plaintiffs re #3 Civil New Case Documents for CKD. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 1/13/2021 (Streeter, J). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/5/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *State of Libya* with answer to complaint due within *90* days. Attorney *Taher Rhuma* *3915 Jennings Ct* *West Sacramento, CA 95691*. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Libya by Taher Rhuma, Mohamad Laham, Khadija Kanoun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Summons & #3 Civil New Case Documents for CKD served on Khadija Kanoun, Mohamad Laham, Taher Rhuma. (Coll, A) Modified on 1/13/2021 (Streeter, J). |
| RECEIPT number #CAE200110447 $400.00 fbo Ahmed T. Rhuma by Ahmed T. Rhuma on 12/1/2020. (Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
