(HC) Barnette v. Atchely
| Kenneth Barnette |
| M. Atchely |
| 2:2020cv02392 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/28/2020. Consent or Decline due by 2/1/2021. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/28/2020 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Kenneth Barnette. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
RECEIPT number #CAE200110980 $5.00 by Kenneth Barnette on 12/22/2020. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:20-cv-2392-KJM-CKD (HC). (Coll, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Kenneth Barnette. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/11/2020 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Kenneth Barnette. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/7/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Becknal, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Kenneth Barnette. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against M. Atchely by Kenneth Barnette.(Becknal, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Barnette v. Atchely | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Barnette | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: M. Atchely | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
