Antech Diagnostics, Inc. et al v. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
| Christian Leutenegger and Antech Diagnostics, Inc. |
| IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02442 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Eugene Novikov* *Durie Tangri LLP* *217 Leidesdorff Street* *San Francisco, CA 94111*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. by Antech Diagnostics, Inc., Christian Leutenegger. Attorney Novikov, Eugene added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9294269) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Ex. 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #14 Notice of Appearance Eugene Novikovene, #15 Notice of Appearance Daralyn Durie)(Novikov, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
