California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Allison
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant: Kathleen Allison
Petitioner: County of Amador
Case Number: 2:2020cv02482
Filed: December 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER by Kathleen Allison. Attorney Lungren, Alanna C. added.(Lungren, Alanna)
January 25, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Carlon, William)
January 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/21/2021 RELATING cases 2:20-cv-2482 WBS AC and 2:21-cv-0038-TLN-DB. (Tupolo, A)
January 19, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:21-cv-0038-TLN-DB by County of Amador. Attorney Tanaka, Eugene added. (Tanaka, Eugene)
January 7, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kathleen Allison served on 12/22/2020. (Carlon, William) Modified on 1/8/2021 (Tupolo, A).
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. (Carlon, William)
December 16, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/12/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.)
December 16, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kathleen Allison* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William Nazar Carlon* *Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard* *245 Kentucky St., Suite B3* *Petaluma, CA 94952-2321*. (Benson, A.)
December 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathleen Allison by California Sportfishing Protection Alliance. Attorney Carlon, William Nazar added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9306480) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carlon, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Represented By: Andrew L. Packard
Represented By: Erica A. Maharg
Represented By: Jason Flanders
Represented By: William Nazar Carlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Allison
Represented By: Alanna C. Lungren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: County of Amador
Represented By: Eugene Tanaka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?