(HC) Gabaldon v. Pickett
| Benerito F. Gabaldon |
| J. Pickett |
| 2:2020cv02489 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from Central District of California case number 5:21-cv-00185. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/1/2021 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order served on Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Benerito F. Gabaldon.(Reader, L) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Reader, L) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/19/2021 DENYING without prejudice #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order served on Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for APPOINTMENT of COUNSEL by Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/21/2020 DISREGARDING #2 Unsigned Motion to Appoint Counsel; ORDERING Clerk to terminate #2 Unsigned Motion; ORDERING Clerk to send Mr. Gabaldon petition form and IFP application; ORDERING Mr. Gabaldon to either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a complete IFP application within 30 days from the date of service of this order; and ORDERING Mr. Gabaldon may file a petition within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, petition form, and IFP application served on Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Benerito F. Gabaldon. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against J. Pickett by Benerito F. Gabaldon.(Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Gabaldon v. Pickett | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J. Pickett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Benerito F. Gabaldon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
