Mattingly v. Pactiv Packaging Inc.
| Perry Mattingly |
| Pactiv Packaging Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02552 |
| December 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT of Identifying Parent Corporations filed by Defendant Pactiv Packaging Inc.. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) Modified on 2/19/2021 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 10
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/17/21. All dispositive motions shall be filed by 11/19/2021. Hearing on such motions shall be on 1/11/2022 at 1:30 PM. All discovery shall be completed by 10/8/2021. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/6/2021 and supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts due by 8/20/2021. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/18/2022 at 10:00 AM and the Jury Trial is SET for 4/4/2022 at 09:00 AM, BOTH in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez.(Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Pactiv Packaging Inc.. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Loomis, Alison) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Pactiv Packaging Inc. re #6 Civil New Case Documents for JAM. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of NO RELATED CASES by Pactiv Packaging Inc. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Pactiv Packaging Inc. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Justin D. Bowlin in support of #1 Notice of Removal. (Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Nicole A. Baarts in support of #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from San Joaquin County Superior Court, case number STK-CV-UOE-2020-0009990 by Pactiv Packaging Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9329565) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bolson-Baarts, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mattingly v. Pactiv Packaging Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Perry Mattingly | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas John Scardigli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pactiv Packaging Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nicole A. Bolson-Baarts |
| Represented By: | Alison C. Loomis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
