(PS) Elfar v. Wilmington Trust, N.A. et al
Joseph B. Elfar |
Wilmington Trust, N.A. and Fay Servicing, LLC |
2:2020mc00273 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to 1/15/2021 to file objections re #5 Findings and Recommendations, by Joseph B. Elfar. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 5 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/3/2020 DENYING #1 Motion to Seal and RECOMMENDING: that #1 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award be denied; that this action be sua sponte dismissed as frivolous; and that the clerk close the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Donati, J) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Joseph B. Elfar. (Donati, J) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Joseph B. Elfar re #1 Motion to Confirm with Exhibits. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 3 AMENDED EXHIBIT by Joseph B. Elfar. (Reader, L) |
NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED: MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award. (Kaminski, H) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200109756 $47.00 by Joseph B. Elfar on 10/23/2020. (Kaminski, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.