Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank et al
Francisco Sapaden |
First National Bank of Omaha, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Synchrony Bank |
2:2021cv00088 |
January 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ANSWER by Synchrony Bank.(Warner, Steven) |
Filing 17 ANSWER by Trans Union, LLC.(Rutter, Evan) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED ENTITIES by National Bank of Omaha. (Rooney, Cory) Modified on 2/19/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 15 ANSWER by First National Bank of Omaha. Attorney Rooney, Cory J. added.(Rooney, Cory) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION for extension of time to respond to complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Song, Kevin) Modified on 2/16/2021 (Reader, L). |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney Song, Kevin Siguo added. (Song, Kevin) |
Filing 12 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/8/2021. Added attorney Evan R. Rutter, PHV for Trans Union, LLC. (Coll, A) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Synchrony Bank. (Warner, Steven) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to EXTEND Time for Defendant Synchrony Bank to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by not more than 28 days. (L. R. 144) by Synchrony Bank. Attorney Warner, Steven P. added. (Warner, Steven) Modified on 2/8/2021 (Tupolo, A). |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (Booth, Eileen) |
Filing 8 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Trans Union, LLC for attorney Evan R. Rutter to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Booth, Eileen T. added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9400884) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Booth, Eileen) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: First National Bank of Omaha served on 1/28/2021, answer due 2/18/2021. (Charity, Garrett) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/16/2021; Trans Union, LLC served on 1/28/2021, answer due 2/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Returned Executed (Experian))(Charity, Garrett) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Synchrony Bank served on 1/26/2021, answer due 2/16/2021. (Charity, Garrett) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Charity, Garrett) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Experian Information Solutions, Inc., First National Bank of Omaha, Synchrony Bank, Trans Union, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Garrett F. Charity* *McCarthy Law PLC* *4250 N. Drinkwater Blvd., Suite 320* *Scottsdale, AZ 85251*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Francisco Sapaden. Attorney Charity, Garrett F. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9363036) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Charity, Garrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.