Brooke v. Advantage Hospitality LLC
| Theresa Brooke |
| Advantage Hospitality LLC Doing business as Hilton Garden Inn Sacramento Airport Natomas |
| 2:2021cv00094 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/17/2021: On the court's own motion, the hearing on plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. #7 ) currently calendared for 3/24/2021 is VACATED and the matter is submitted without appearance and argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) and (g). If the court subsequently concludes that oral argument or supplemental briefing is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. (Text Only Entry)(Streeter, J) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Theresa Brooke. Motion Hearing set for 3/24/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 2/22/2021 (Streeter, J). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Advantage Hospitality LLC* (Reader, L) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Advantage Hospitality LLC by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Krostofer)(Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 2/19/2021 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Advantage Hospitality LLC served on 1/20/2021, answer due 2/10/2021. (Strojnik, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Advantage Hospitality LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter Kristofer Strojnik* *Esplanade Center III, Suite 700* *2415 East Camelback Road* *Phoenix, AZ 85016*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advantage Hospitality LLC by Theresa Brooke. Attorney Strojnik, Peter added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9367025) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brooke v. Advantage Hospitality LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advantage Hospitality LLC Doing business as Hilton Garden Inn Sacramento Airport Natomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Theresa Brooke | |
| Represented By: | Peter Kristofer Strojnik |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
