Fowler et al v. FAF, Inc. et al
Dennis Fowler and Shannon Fowler |
Iris Bennett, Rolling With Amos Trucking, LLC and FAF, Inc. |
2:2021cv00181 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to DISMISS and MOTION to STRIKE by Iris Bennett, FAF, Inc., Rolling With Amos Trucking, LLC. Attorney Castillo, Marco Garcia added. Motion Hearing set for 4/15/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Castillo, Marco) Modified on 3/8/2021 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Shannon Fowler, Dennis Fowler.(Phillips, Noah) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Iris Bennett, FAF, Inc., Rolling With Amos Trucking, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Noah Phillips* *Hughey Phillips, LLP* *520 9th Street, Suite 230* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Shannon Fowler, Dennis Fowler. Attorney Phillips, Noah added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9389672) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Phillips, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.