Vega v. Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. et al
| David Vega |
| Allied Building Products Corp., Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., Edgar Ruelas, Leonardo Flores Beltran and Joseph Vasquez |
| 2:2021cv00191 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/11/2021, REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court Re Case Number34-02020-00289466. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER remanding action to the Superior Court of California county of Sacramento by David Vega. (Magante, Edzyl) Modified on 6/14/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 12 CASE DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Allied Building Products Corp. and with prejudice as to Defendant Edgar Ruelas. See #10 , #11 Stipulations for Dismissal. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Defendant Edgar Ruelas From This Action With Prejudice by David Vega. (Magante, Edzyl) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Dismissing Defendant Allied Building Products Corp. From This Action Without Prejudice by David Vega. (Magante, Edzyl) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: The parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report pursuant to the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26, in accordance with Local Rule 240 and the Court's Order Requiring Service of Process and Joint Status Report, within fourteen (14) days. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 8 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants by David Vega. (Magante, Edzyl) Modified on 6/4/2021 (Coll, A). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/1/2021 GRANTING plaintiff leave to file their Second Amended Complaint with defendants' responsive pleading due 30 days thereafter. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Allowing Plaintiff Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by David Vega. Attorney Magante, Edzyl Josef Gonzales added. (Magante, Edzyl) |
| Filing 5 [DISREGARD - noncompliant] STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER Allowing Plaintiff Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by David Vega. (Anbari, Malalai) Modified on 5/18/2021 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Defendants re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil New Case Documents for JAM. (Manoukian, Michael) Modified on 2/4/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Michael W.M. Manoukian on behalf of Allied Building Products Corp., Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., Edgar Ruelas, Joseph Vasquez. Attorney Manoukian, Michael W.M. added. (Manoukian, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento County Superior Court Superior, case number 34-2020-00289466 by Allied Building Products Corp, Beacon Sales Acquisition, Ruelas and Vasquez. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9392349) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Notice of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure)(Cogbill, Karin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
