Divine Enterprises v. Walmart
| Walmart Doing business as Sam's Club |
| Divine Enterprises, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00209 |
| February 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| John A Mendez |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
JUDGMENT dated *6/3/2021* pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/2/2021 CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/2/2021 GRANTING #17 Walmart's Motion to Dismiss. Divine's claims against it are DISMISSED with Prejudice. Walmart's counsel must send a check payable to the Clerk for the EDCA for $150.00 no later than seven days from the date of this order. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER: The motion now calendared for 5/18/2021 is SUBMITTED without appearance and without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing on said motion is VACATED. If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 19 REPLY by Walmart re #18 Opposition to Motion. (Booth, Hillary) |
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION by Divine Enterprises, Inc. to #17 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to DISMISS by Walmart. Motion Hearing set for 5/18/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Booth, Hillary) |
| Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Divine Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment #1, #2 Exhibit Attachment #2, #3 Exhibit Attachment #3, #4 Proof of Service)(Cass, Paul) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/19/21 ORDERING that the proposed amended complaint identified as Attachment #1 to #13 the Stipulation is to be filed by plaintiff. Defendant Walmart shall have 14 days after service of the amended pleading to file a responsive pleading. (Kastilahn, A)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER re #13 Stipulation by Divine Enterprises, Inc. (Cass, Paul) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to file an Amended Complaint by Divine Enterprises, Inc. (Cass, Paul) Modified on 3/19/2021 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 12 [DISREGARD] STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to the Complaint by Walmart. (Booth, Hillary) Modified on 3/19/2021 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: On 2/3/2021, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal. See ECF No. #1 . Defendant was served with the complaint on 1/8/2021. See ECF No. #1 -1. On 3/9/2021, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. See ECF No. #10 . Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was improperly filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. #10 , is STRICKEN. Plaintiff shall seek leave of court, in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) and Local Rule 137(c), prior to re-filing the proposed first amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. [TEXT ONLY ENTRY] (Michel, G.) |
| Filing 10 [STRICKEN - see 11 Minute Order] FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Walmart by Divine Enterprises, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Attachment #1, #2 Attachment #2, #3 Attachment #3, #4 Proof of Service) (Cass, Paul) Modified on 3/10/2021 (Michel, G.). |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Extend time to Plead in Response to Complaint by Walmart. (Booth, Hillary) Modified on 2/23/2021 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Hillary Arrow Booth for Walmart, attorney Ian Paul Culver terminated (Culver, Ian) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending time to Plead in Response to Complaint by Walmart. (Culver, Ian) Modified on 2/10/2021 (Becknal, R). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Walmart. (Culver, Ian) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Walmart re #1 Notice of Removal. (Culver, Ian) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Walmart. (Culver, Ian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Walmart (Culver, Ian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Placer County Superior Court, case number S-CV-0046010 by Walmart . (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9396589) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Culver, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Divine Enterprises v. Walmart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Doing business as Sam's Club | |
| Represented By: | Ian Paul Culver |
| Represented By: | Hillary Arrow Booth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Divine Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Paul L Cass |
| Represented By: | Paul L. Cass |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
