(HC) Long v. Johnson
Petitioner: Jesse Richard Long
Respondent: Raybon Johnson
Case Number: 2:2021cv00256
Filed: February 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Raybon Johnson. (Eldridge, David)
March 18, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Raybon Johnson: State Court Record. (Attachments: #1 CT I of I, #2 CT Supp I of I, #3 RT I of II, #4 RT II of II, #5 AOB, #6 RB, #7 ARB, #8 Opinion, #9 PFR and order, #10 Order on Remand)(Eldridge, David)
March 11, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
February 25, 2021 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Eldridge, David)
February 17, 2021 Filing 5 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #3 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition. (Yin, K)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/17/21. (cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/17/2021 DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the petition within 60 days. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
February 17, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Jesse Richard Long. (Yin, K)
February 12, 2021 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/18/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
February 12, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Jesse Richard Long. (Rodriguez, E)
February 10, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Raybon Johnson by Jesse Richard Long.(Rodriguez, E)
February 10, 2021 RECEIPT number #CAE200112038 $5.00 by Jesse Richard Long Received on 2/10/2021, processed on 2/11/2021. (Rodriguez, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Long v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse Richard Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raybon Johnson
Represented By: David Andrew Eldridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?