Arroyo v. 110 F Street LLC
| Rafael Arroyo |
| 110 F Street LLC |
| 2:2021cv00260 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Morrison C England |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by 110 F Street LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nordlander, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant 110 F Street LLC. (Nordlander, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/8/2021 SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY Jeffrey A. Nordlander for 110 F Street LLC in place of attorney Janelle Jad Sahouria. (Tupolo, A)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the Substitution of Attorney and Proposed Order (ECF No. 6). Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 6 SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by 110 F Street LLC. (Nordlander, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION to EXTEND TIME to 4/12/2021, for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading to #1 Complaint by 110 F Street LLC. Attorney Sahouria, Janelle Jad added. (Sahouria, Janelle) Modified on 3/11/2021 (York, M). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: 110 F Street LLC served on 2/22/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *110 F Street LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Russell Handy* *Center for Disability Access* *8033 Linda Vista Road, Suite 200* *San Diego, CA 92111*. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Rafael Arroyo. Attorney Handy, Russell added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9409349) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arroyo v. 110 F Street LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rafael Arroyo | |
| Represented By: | Russell Handy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 110 F Street LLC | |
| Represented By: | Janelle Jad Sahouria |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Nordlander |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
