(HC) Franklin v. Hill
Derrick James Franklin |
Rick Hill |
2:2021cv00275 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Gregory G Hollows |
John A Mendez |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/3/2021 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, and affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the required fees in the amount of $402.00; DISMISSING the petition for habeas corpus with leave to amend to state a civil rights claim; GRANTING Petitioner 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint; and ORDERING Clerk to send Petitioner a new IFP application and blank civil right complaint form. (Henshaw, R) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, civil rights complaint form, and IFP application served on Derrick James Franklin. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-00275-JAM-GGH. (Tupolo, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Derrick James Franklin. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 [COPY of Order filed in case 2:20-cv-2382] ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/11/2021 ORDERING the Clerk to open a new separate habeas action and file the petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the new action. This new action shall address the Proposition 57 issue only. The new habeas action shall further be assigned to the undersigned. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Derrick James Franklin. (Yin, K) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Derrick James Franklin. (Originally filed in case no. 2:20-cv-2382.) (Yin, K) |
Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Derrick James Franklin. (Originally filed in case no. 2:20-cv-2382.) (Yin, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Franklin v. Hill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Rick Hill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Derrick James Franklin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.