(HC) Asbury v. Warden
Plaintiff: Cameron Asbury
Defendant: Warden
Case Number: 2:2021cv00297
Filed: February 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/15/2021 GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner to file his objections or forms within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
April 15, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Cameron Asbury. (Henshaw, R)
April 12, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to by Cameron Asbury. (Rodriguez, E) Modified on 4/14/2021 (Plummer, M).
April 5, 2021 Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/5/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
April 5, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Findings and Recommendations served on Cameron Asbury. (Henshaw, R)
March 2, 2021 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-297-TLN KJN (HC). (Coll, A)
March 2, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Cameron Asbury. (Coll, A)
March 1, 2021 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/19/2021 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
February 19, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Cameron Asbury. (Henshaw, R)
February 17, 2021 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/22/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
February 17, 2021 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Cameron Asbury. (Rodriguez, E)
February 16, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden by Cameron Asbury.(Rodriguez, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Asbury v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cameron Asbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?