(PC) Tunstall v. Nappi
Plaintiff: Robert William Tunstall, Jr.
Defendant: Arno Nappi
Case Number: 2:2021cv00308
Filed: February 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edmund F Brennan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/30/21 ORDERING if plaintiff wishes to proceed, he must submit either the filing fee or the affidavit required by 1915(a) within 30 days from the date of service of this order. Once again, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.(Plummer, M)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order, and prisoner IFP form served on Robert William Tunstall Jr. (Plummer, M)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE by Robert William Tunstall, Jr. to #8 Order. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Reader, L)
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Robert William Tunstall, Jr (Rodriguez, E)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Robert William Tunstall, Jr re #5 Consent/Decline of Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Becknal, R)
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rodriguez, E)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Robert William Tunstall, Jr.. (Tupolo, A)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2021 ORDERING if Plaintiff wishes to proceed, he must submit either the filing fee or the application required by 1915(a) within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Robert William Tunstall Jr. (Henshaw, R)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 3/25/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Robert William Tunstall Jr.. (Rodriguez, E)
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Arno Nappi by Robert William Tunstall, Jr. (MAINTAINED ON PAPER) (Rodriguez, E)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Tunstall v. Nappi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arno Nappi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert William Tunstall, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?