(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kimalae Raphel Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2021cv00326
Filed: February 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan)
March 26, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF SUBMITTING SERVICE DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Marshal by Kimalae Raphel Smith pursuant to order of the court. (Pena, Jonathan)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL; Consent or Decline due by 6/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Zignago, K.)
March 15, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Zignago, K.)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/12/2021 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment for social security cases. Within twenty-eight (28) days, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the United States Marshal. Within fourteen (14) days after submitting the necessary documents to the UnitedStates Marshal, plaintiff shall file a declaration stating the date on which the documents were submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve process not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. After service of the complaint this action and the dates set forth in the Scheduling Order are stayed pursuant to General Order Number 615. The stay will be automatically lifted when the Commissioner files the Certified Administrative Record. (Zignago, K.)
February 22, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Kimalae Raphel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan)
February 22, 2021 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Kimalae Raphel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan)
February 22, 2021 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Benson, A.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimalae Raphel Smith
Represented By: Jonathan Omar Pena
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?